Dec. 3, 1979. A Canadian tourist, Kenneth Ockendon, was enjoying a hotel breakfast in London. He would be touring the city taking photographs. He had finished visiting relatives and would be flying home the next day. At noon he met another man, Dennis Nilsen, at a West End pub. Dennis had left work early and was likewise enjoying the afternoon. The two chatted awhile and then set off visiting the city’s famous spots to take photos. As dusk fell they headed back to Nilesn’s flat to have a meal and then to go out drinking again. They had become friends within that short period of time.
Following dinner at the flat it was decided that they would go out to buy liquor and beer, then return to the flat to watch TV and listen to music. They were enjoying each other’s company. Dennis later recounted that this was the happiest day of the year for him. Only one thing seemed to bother him; his new friend would be leaving the next day to return to his own country.
Ockendon never did return home. The newspapers had reports and stories which raised the question of why he didn’t return, where he was now. He had disappeared.
t/Moon-opposite-n/Sun Return of Dec. 3, 1979
Dennis did not have a clear recollection of that night’s happenings but did remember the following days. This gets very bizarre and may disturb some readers. Dennis remembers that night dragging his new friend across the floor with the cords of his ear phones. To do so, he must have strangled his recently-acquired friend first. This was stated as happening after midnight, technically Dec. 4th. They must have both been quite drunk. Dennis unwrapped the cord and put the ear phones on, made himself a drink and then listened to music with the other man laying dead on the floor. He later stripped the body and cleaned it up. He then placed the body in the bed and then he got into bed and fell asleep.
Let us review this Return chart which occurred on the day of the meeting and just hours before the murder. t/Neptune-IC can indicate both the drinking that occurred that evening as well as the inability to fully remember the events. Note n/Mercury near t/Neptune-IC; distorted memory functions. t/Saturn-Asc. points to the harshness that seems to emerge from Nilsen when he is with others. That may come directly from the natal Saturn-MC-Mars pattern which links Saturn’s rigorous tones with his own sense of career and self-direction which is, in turn, subject to the aggression and anger he places upon his view of the world about him. He has always had to fight for a place in the world which has always made life difficult for him; this being his interpretation of his chart’s expression. We might choose to link this to his feeling vulnerable as a child to the poverty and tough living conditions, and the difficulties fitting in and being accepted by others.
The following day of Dec. 4, 1979, he cleaned up the apartment, got rid of the man’s clothes, and then placed him, doubled up, in a cabinet. In the evening he took the body out of the cabinet, dressed it, and then later placed it under the floor boards of the apartment. Over the next two weeks he would take the body out of its hiding place, place him into an arm chair, talk and drink. Then he would wrap the body up and replace it under the floor boards. Apparently the apartment was either built directly over the ground or over a cold cellar area as the body, according to Dennis, stayed ‘quite fresh.’ The book doesn’t, at its recounting of this particular murder, mention the final disposal of the body. That may come later in this very complicated story. Let us advance the Return chart one day to Dec. 4th.
This Dec. 4th chart is calculated for 12:44 AM, very close to the actual time of the murder it would seem. Note t/Saturn exactly on the Asc. and opposite the t/Part of Fortune (PoF). (Recall my comments on his natal Saturn-MC-Mars pattern). How his anger and inability to cope with life is expressed seems here, now, to be subject to the whims of the moment. t/Pluto, not angular in this chart, is conjoining the n/Ascendant — a ‘substitute’ condition. He has now established a mode of operation in his ‘pick-up’ relationships with other young men. So, we have all angles of the chart, both natal and transiting-cyclic, activated. Keeping the bodies tells us that he wants to retain their company while at the same time providing his own rules of conversation and comportment. Apparently they do not satisfy him in all the ways he would like.
If we try to rationalize the behavior or removing the body from its hiding place and playing ‘company’ with it or sleeping with it before returning it below the floor boards, we might chock that up to Venus squaring Neptune; a perverted love or fantasy. Natal Venus squares natal Pluto; a “love for the dead” is one way to state this. We have to remember that Dennis was very upset over his grandfathers death and also over the man who drowned behind the school. He never quite grasped the full meaning of death when it occurred to others, or how it should impact him. We will see this pattern of wanting to keep the dead close to him during the balance of his killing career. We saw something similar a few years ago when I blogged about the Scottish killer Brady who looked into his victim’s eyes while they died. He later said that he never found what he was looking for in the death’s of others.
In many cyclic charts I have noted Venus being angular at the time of death OR at the time when one falls in love. Both situations have one similarity; life seems to suddenly be brought into balance and harmony. In this case t/Venus is in the 4th house but it can only represent the death of another — or can it also apply to Dennis himself in some way? With n/Venus square n/Pluto Dennis seems to struggle with the concept of death or dying and how to relate to it. With recently acquired friends whom he kills, all of the affection or Venus-qualities would largely have to be his own — projected upon the other person. If their continuing company, after death, is satisfying to him then their death’s have less meaning. If their death and the role they conversationally and physically provide for him is not satisfactory, then he ultimately does not find satisfactory answers in their deaths. So, he kills again. Does that make sense to you, the reader?
We will follow more of Nilsen’s twisted path toward reconciling his relationship to death in the following blogs. Dave.