The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to announce its findings following three days of hearings in March concerning the two-year old “Obama-Care” Health Plan. In this post I’d like to review how I came to select the date of June 19, 2012 as the date that the Supreme Court makes its announcement.
The primary predictive system used on this blog site is that of precession-corrected Solar Returns and their “in between” progressed angles and daily transit charts. The Solar Return chart angles are progressed some 1.25 degrees per day (on average, and based on the difference between one Solar Return’s Sidereal Time and the following Solar Return’s Sidereal Time. This difference is proportioned over 365.25 days of the calendar year at a flat rate which is then adjusted for Equation of Time variances in the daily apparent Sun’s motion. Riyal software, which is described and which can be downloaded and used following instructions in the menu-bar items, will perform these calculations and produce the charts used here on this blog.
May 23, 2012 was considered. t/MC conjoins t/N.Node: The focus is on the public’s association and interaction with the Health Care issue. t/Asc squares t/Jupiter: The public reacts to court issues from a variety of perspectives. t/Sun opposes the t/MC: The whole issue is under basic review and restructuring. It is my opinion that the basic findings of the court were likely completed on this date but time is required to both write the many arguments for-and-against portions of the bill and to fine tune the ultimate announcement. This date had a low possibility.
June 6, 2012 was considered. t/MC at 20 Sag squares hc/Jupiter/Uranus midpoint: Surprising advancements and developments. t/Moon conjoins t/Pluto in the 10th: The public reacts strongly to fundamental changes imposed by the court ruling. t/Asc conjoins hc/Jupiter: the court’s view of the benefits and resources required for those benefits (the mandate funding) are directly adjusted/changed. This date has some degree of possibility but not a high degree.
June 11/12, 2012 was considered. t/Mercury conjoins the hc/Asc. (health care Ascendant) and hc/Moon: News for the public. t/Asc conjoins hc/Sun (over the next couple of days): Upsets occur which threaten the public view of the Health Care act and its viability and core structure. With t/Moon at this t/Asc. position, the publicity of this date and event is likely to be high. t/Mars & t/Sun are square this date: Arguments are likely to experienced. This date had a reasonable possibility of being the “announcement” date.
June 19, 2012 was the date selected for the court’s announcement. t/Asc. conjoins t/Uranus at the hc/Mercury: Exciting news and change is the issue of the day. t/MC conjoins hc/Pluto (5 Capricorn) with t/Pluto close by and to be activated 2 days later, t/MC opposed to hc/Moon at hc/Asc.: Altogether this whole complex can be seen as “when the fit hits the shan” (mix the letters around). t/Moon conjoins t/Sun in the 6th house: A new start occurs relative to health and workers. t/Mars conjoins the MC of the March hearing dates: The court’s decision is subject to bitterness and anger, likely due to a split decision which actually leads to more problems than solutions. We can expect that portions of the Health Care law reviewed by the Court will be returned to Congress for clarification or change, leading to public and political outrage in this upcoming election period. This date has so much contention, change and public involvement that it stands out as a focal date for the Court’s announcement.
June 27, 2012 was another date considered. t/MC conjoins hc/N.Node, square hc/Merury and square t/Moon in the late 6th house: The status of the public’s benefits are impacted by news that emerges, unrest is to be expected as the public’s views are interpreted and expressed by others to suit their own views.t/Asc loosely opposes t/Saturn and squares hc/Mars and t/Mercury: Restrictions and unhappiness make the news. t/Sun conjoins hc/Moon at hc/Asc.: A light is shown on the public’s needs and how it can react to what is happening relative to health care. Protests and organized responses make the news. This is also a date that has to be considered. It seems to be more of an aftermath date.
Again, without being a political analyst, a follower of the Supreme Court, one who is knowledgeable about the Health Care Act in detail, it would seem that the Court will play its role by returning portions of the Health Care Act to Congress for either clarification or for rework, leaving much of the bill intact, but some of it up in the air until the political process is worked out to clean up the mess made by both the Court and Congress. All of this should fuel the fall election process to a great extent. Dave